UPDATE (5:23 pm, August 10, 2015): Friday evening, Judge Sullivan entered an order in response to Judicial Watch’s emergency filing. He instructed the State Department to ask Ms. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills not to destroy any emails. Neither Ms. Abedin nor Ms. Mills provided a certification under penalty of perjury as the judge had requested in his order a week ago. Ms. Clinton has provided a carefully worded and hedged certification that can be read here. She claims she has provided all emails “in her custody” – or directed them to be produced. That refers to the 55,000 emails her staff already carefully culled. We know that “all records in her custody” does not mean all federal records she had received or created—because additional ones have already been produced by her confidant Sidney Blumenthal. Ms. Clinton also said that Ms. Mills did not have an address on her private server but that Ms. Abedin did. There is an unconfirmed report that Ms. Mills’ attorneys have advised that she will not destroy the emails she has in digital form.
In a letter sent to the U.S. State Department and just filed today with U.S. federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, the counsel for Cheryl Mills wrote: “Ms. Mills does not believe that she has paper copies of potential records in her possession. Following our production on August 10, 2015 [of the defense counsel’s version of the electronic records], we have instructed her to delete any and all electronic records in her possession.”
That is a far stretch from a statement by Ms. Mills under penalty of perjury, and she and her lawyers appear to be planning to delete the emails Judge Sullivan wants produced.
Judicial Watch has made an emergency filing in Judge Sullivan’s court to stop the further destruction of evidence of what may very well be assorted criminal conduct and violations of numerous federal laws.
This all just surfaced in State Department’s status report filed today in response to Judge Sullivan’s order. Yesterday evening, State finally produced some correspondence between itself and Hillary’s right and left hands—Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills. It has not produced its correspondence with Ms. Clinton, and it is now clear that Ms. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills plan to thumb their noses at the Judge and the State Department. No one is “cooperating,” despite their empty rhetoric to the contrary.
The correspondence that has been produced verifies that the State Department itself has not been forthcoming with Judge Sullivan, with Congress, or with anyone else. Using her private server allowed Ms. Clinton to use an off-the-grid system for her entire tenure in the Department, and the State Department kept that startling fact a secret as long as possible. It is simply shocking that the State Department did not immediately inform Congress, the Court, and Judicial Watch that Ms. Clinton operated solely on a private email server and that the State Department did not have her records. It took months even to discover those crucial facts. And as Judge Emmet G. Sullivan bores toward the truth, more revelations continue to surface.
It is especially telling that there was no Inspector General at the State Department while Ms. Clinton led the department. That independent watchdog surely would have put a stop to such an illegal and unauthorized practice immediately. Obviously, that is why Ms. Clinton didn’t allow an Inspector General. As soon as the Inspector General had the opportunity to review her first 40 emails, he immediately identified classified or sensitive information that should never have been outside the State’s secure channels.
And despite the Obama administration’s countless claims that it knew nothing of her private account, the few emails already