According to Islamic law, Barack Obama is a Muslim because his father was a Muslim. He referred to the Islamic call to prayer as “one of the prettiest sounds on earth at sunset”; he has Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators throughout his administration; he’s defended Huma Abedin; he referred to his “Muslim faith” in a Freudian slip during an interview with George Stephanopolous; he’s sided with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt; he’s a close friend of Rashid Khalidi, former Yasser Arafat media spokesman; he’s aligned with Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who seeks the return of the Ottoman Empire; and the Middle East is on fire.
Shall I go on?
So, if Obama is a Muslim who seeks to facilitate the resurrection of the Ottoman Caliphate, why is he being so aggressive with ISIS?
The answer to that question very well may have to do with Muruna or stealth jihad.
As Shoebat.com reported, Muslim Brotherhood’s spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi is on record as saying that the Islamic Caliphate should rest in Turkey:
“Turkey is the Caliphate State, and Istanbul is its capital … Turkey unites religion and the world, Arab (Wahhabist Sunnis) and Persian (Shiites), Asia and Africa, and it (the Caliphate) should be based upon this nation (Turkey).”
As we wrote in The Case FOR Islamophobia, Qaradawi is the quintessential expert on a Sunni tactic known as Muruna, which is a very close – but dominant – cousin to taqqiya. Muruna allows Muslims to do whatever is necessary to further Islam, even if it means blaspheming Islam itself.
For example, a Muslim is not supposed to kill another Muslim. However, once Muruna is introduced, there are scenarios that permit it.
Right now, ISIS has surpassed al-Qaeda when it comes to sheer Muslim savagery. For the western world to tolerate – much less embrace – ISIS is political suicide.
Launching air strikes against ISIS actually serves at least two purposes when it comes to the political agenda of Murunists and stealth jihadists. By killing ISIS jihadists, the Obama administration is seen as killing terrorists in much the same way that it was seen doing so with drone attacks on al-Qaeda. Another consequence is that by weakening ISIS, the Obama administration would be keeping the Islamic cat in the bag.
To quote Obama’s ideological hero Saul Alinsky, this exemplifies the following tenet:
“Use all the events of the period for your purpose.”
Speaking of Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood cleric does indeed sanction Muslims killing Muslims. He writes (translated):
…killing Muslims whom the unbelievers use as shields… leaving these unbelievers is a danger to the Muslims, so it is permissible to kill these unbelievers even if Muslims are killed with them in the process.
It is not difficult to extrapolate this rationale to Muslims killing Muslims to limit both political damage as well as the exposure of stealth jihadist groups in the U.S.
Is Obama practicing Muruna when he hits ISIS?
If he’s a Muslim, Muruna would permit it.